Recently Discovered Dinosaur ‘Mummy’ Is So Well-Preserved It Even Has The Skin And Guts Intact

“We don’t just have a skeleton,” one researcher involved said. “We have a dinosaur as it would have been.”

Nodosaur: highlight of the dino exhibit at the Royal Tyrrell Museum of Palaeontology in Alberta, Canada. Robert Clark/National Geographic

Scientists are hailing it as the best-preserved dinosaur specimen ever discovered. That’s why you cannot see its bones – they remain covered by intact skin and armor.

Found accidentally by miners in Canada, this fossilized nodosaur is more than 110 million years old, yet patterns are still visible on the skin. According to the Royal Tyrrell Museum of Palaeontology in Alberta, Canada, which recently unveiled the find, the dinosaur is so well-preserved that instead of a ‘fossil’, we could safely call it a ‘dinosaur mummy.’

The holotype of Borealopelta on display at the Royal Tyrrell Museum in Alberta. Image credit: ケラトプスユウタ

The researchers examining the find were astounded at its nearly unprecedented level of preservation. The creature’s skin, armor, and even some of its guts were intact – something they’d never seen before.

“You don’t need to use much imagination to reconstruct it; if you just squint your eyes a bit, you could almost believe it was sleeping,” one researcher said.

Previously, only nodosaur skeletons have been discovered, which look like this:

Nodosaur bones at Houston Museum of Natural Science at Sugar Land, Fort Bend Co., Texas. Image credit: fossilmike

This dinosaur was built like a tank. A member of a newly discovered species called nodosaur, it was an enormous four-legged herbivore protected by a spiky, plated armor. It weighed approximately 3,000 pounds.

To give you an idea of how intact the mummified nodosaur is: it still weighs 2,500 pounds!

Nodosaur (armoured dinosaur) fossil discovered at the Suncor Mine near Fort McMurray by Government of Alberta

Although how the dinosaur mummy could remain so intact for so long remains somewhat of a mystery, researchers suggest that the nodosaur may have been swept away by a flooded river and carried out to sea, where it eventually sank to the ocean floor.

As millions of years passed, minerals could have settled on the dinosaur’s armor and skin. This might help explain why the creature was preserved in such a lifelike form.

Researchers have named the 5.5 metre (18-foot-long) nodosaur Borealopelta markmitchelli, in honour of Royal Tyrrell Museum technician Mark Mitchell, who spent over 7,000 hours carefully unearthing the fossil from its rocky grave.

Technician Mark Mitchell prepping the Nodosaur. Royal Tyrrell Museum

But how ‘lifelike’ is the specimen really? Well, apparently the preservation was so good that researchers were able to tell the dinosaur’s skin color by using mass spectrometry techniques to detect the actual pigments.

This way they found out that the nodosaur’s coloring was a dark reddish brown on the top of the body – and lighter on the underside. Since this dinosaur was an herbivore, its skin color must have played a role in protecting it from the enormous carnivores present at the time.

And the fact that we’re talking about a massive, heavily-armored dinosaur illustrates just how dangerous those predators must have been…

Robert Clark/National Geographic

The nodosaur was found by an unsuspecting excavator operator that uncovered the historic discovery while digging in an oil sands mine, according to the museum’s news release about the exhibit. 7,000 painstaking reconstruction hours later, the nodosaur was ready to meet the public.

As if the preservation of skin, armor, and guts weren’t impressive enough, the dinosaur mummy is also unique in that it was preserved in three dimensions, with the original shape of the animal retained.

A National Geographic video about the nodosaur, the best-preserved dinosaur ever discovered.

According to one researcher, “it will go down in science history as one of the most beautiful and best preserved dinosaur specimens – the Mona Lisa of dinosaurs.”

Robert Clark/National Geographic

The Mona Lisa of dinosaurs… It is indeed, isn’t it?

Sources: 1, 2, 3, 4


  1. And it just happens to look EXACTLY how the scientists imagined dinosaurs to look like based on skeletal remains. Come. On.

  2. The article’s use of vernacular language obscures a primary fact that many commenters have not understood: The fossil is 100% rock. There is no flesh or original organic material (other than traces, such as pigments). Fossilization is a process of permineralization and polymerization.

    • Yet the article says: “so well-preserved that instead of a ‘fossil’, we could safely call it a ‘dinosaur mummy.’”


      “The creature’s skin, armor, and even some of its guts were intact.”

  3. How did this survive in such pristine condition for your supposed timeline of 110 million years ? Explain that one… go ahead, I’ll wait… I don’t want anything I have too take on faith like: “A perfectly preserved DNA sample could THEORETICALLY last about 6.8 million years” Explain to me how thats possible. Even if it could, 6.8 is not 100 million years. Carbon-14 only lasts 10,000 years MAX… This thing has carbon 14 in it. Explain that too.

  4. I hope no one tries toclone this thing. It is a herbivore and won’t eat you and all. But, if it tries to be friendly. Well, (sorry about your spleen Bill) and then there is the whole what if… What if he is as playfull as a puppy when master comes home? Sorry about the wall and everything, but look on the bright side. Your closest is clear now.

  5. So I don’t get the big piece of chicken Because the big rooster just chased the little rooster away from the hens !!! what darwin !!!

  6. What an amazing find. I would really love to take my family to go see the exhibit this dino mummy is at. This planets past is just so fascinating. ?

  7. I want to look that good at 10 million years old. LOL! These people “scientists”, if they thought twice about what they say before they say it, they would think twice about saying it.

  8. Millions of years old……..and it’s intact!? WOW! Um….no.
    1. Sinew and skin can’t survive for that length of time.
    2. Evolution is a theory.
    Prove me wrong.

    • Yes evolution is a theory. But Do you know what a scientific theory is?
      Do you have a alternative to the theory of evolution?
      Why it is called a theory is not because it is a guess, evolution is a fact. The precise details are open to revision. However we have countless papers and scientific disciplines to verify it.
      And this is not some anti religious creationist opposed agenda, the most hardcore atheist, the most pro evolution scientist in the world would kill to be able to provide solid evidence that disproves it. They would be famous forever.
      Much like one name is synonymous with evolution today-Darwin, the person who can disprove it, would be famous forever.
      The idea that it’s just a guess-How the intellectually challenged think to interpret “theory”-is so false it is laughable.
      So do we need to change your mind?
      No, the claim is, all the evidence, geologically, biologically, paleontological, radioactive, genetically, etc etc, says the best evidence peer reviewed supports the hypothesis so well, we can call it a working theory.
      No one ever has offered anything that stands up to scrutiny, so if you don’t believe, well plenty idiots have existed before, so you are not alone, but if you have a better idea, put it forth see if the evidence is even able to get far enough to stop people laughing in your face. No one else ever has but by all means try

      • I believe man was created to kill our earth and he is doing a dam fine job. Artificial insemination, by alien’s can answer all questions, but we need DNA from a alien to prove it,does anyone have one?

      • I wasn’t going to reply but what the heck. Micro-evolution has been proven without a shadow of a doubt. That is changes within a species. Macro-evolution has never been proven. It is a theory of science. The “ evidence “ that is missing to prove the theory is called the missing link. That is any hard evidence that species can evolve into other species. That has never been proven. Not even close. The thought of a bird being able to change into a fish or Vice versa is a “theory”. Never even close to proving. If man evolved from a single cell organism and thus evolved into man there would be bones and evidence of that transformation scattered all over the place. But there is not. And also to spread light on the subject it would not stop happening. It would continue to happen. It’s funny nothing has evolved into anything for millions of years. It hasn’t happened and never will. Now if anyone responds to this post I challenge you to do this t in a manner of respect. You are not allowed to call names or s as ct like a child. Thanks

        • That is just showing how much of a science illiterate you are. Fish don’t become birds, that’s ot how it works. It would be nice, if creationists used half the energy they use in writing inane comments into learning what evolution actually talks about. Macroevolution is just a big succession of microevolutions. Young earth creationists had to accept microevolution as real, because it made them look ridiculous not to. But evolution on a larger scale is undeniable, demonstrated by tons of connecting evidence.

      • Phlogestein, ether, newton, were once seen as fact. Those who opposed the theories were laughable. Theories are provisional models of reality not fact. Don’t confuse the map and the territory.

    • Actually some humans have been found covered in limestone under water still with there skin and organs intact and their hundreds of years old, so maybe this Dino was actually covered in limestone for a very long time and and that said limestone preserved it enough so when it was incaved the body naturally stayed the same and fossilised.

    • Oh jeez. Another believer who believes fairy tales by so-called christian writers so he knows who came first! Wrong. Religion is a man made system used to influence and control others. Think of any government. A propaganda machine. Look it up! Prove me wrong!

    • How did a man supposedly walk on water tell me how the earth is only 4000 years old …tell me how a man died then came back to life ….I’ll take a theroritcal scientific hypothesis over faith any day

    • You absolute moron. Things can stay intact and have done previously. Creatures found in ice is a very common discovery

    • It is all stone! Minerals replaced all living tissues.usually the flesh and organs decompose before they can become fossilized – that is why this find is so rare. Life has existed on earth over 500 million years- get use to it.

  9. There is a place near my land . Where folisied human finger turned to stone have been found … Can anyone do some research here. In Pakistan in Pindighap area … Lots of stuff is found .. fingers .. thumb n other artyfacts.

  10. Evolution makes a lot of sense , except for the beginning of evolution. That makes no sense at all. It takes a lot of faith to believe in evolution. Lose fur so we can wear fur? Anyway we will find out some day. Why argue?

    • I, sir, am not a cretin and I believe in creationism. I also believe that dinosaurs roamed the earth and some of them have evolved – or adapted – to modern times. however, I do NOT believe that man evolved from the ape. We were too suddenly in the picture, in too many different varieties.

      All mankind originating from a single man and woman seems doubtful as, in the Bible, Cain goes to the land of nod, east of Eden. When there, he “had relations with his wife, who conceived and bore a son who was named Enoch,” (Gen. 4:17) Therefore, more humans were created, doubtless after Adam and Eve were cast from the Garden.

  11. you all realize this argument is pointless right? You really should put all this thought and effort towards something important, like opening your eyes and seeing that the worlds leaders are currently using a flu-like virus, that was created in a laboratory, doesn’t kill any more people than the flu does every year, and then through a vicious propaganda campaign make sure they keep the people in the world in a prisoners without bars, keeping them from being productive, making sure their survival completely depends upon their decisions and wants and needs, and keeping the public controlled and manipulated through fear tactics and dis-misinformation.

      • You do realize neither of your comments were about this article right? All you did was bad mouth people for believing in something you dont. How about you keep your negativity elsewhere. Ignorant, should have been your name.

  12. So you’re telling me that a million years ago… nothing exploded for no reason… and created… everything? Where’s the logic in that. There’s no way this thing was around hundreds of millions of years ago and we are just now finding it with how preserved it is…

    • It was under the sand and it’s the first found and excavated. Who know what people use to dig up and find before they could send new and pictures around the world? We might have already found this and just no way to I’m cover it now that’s a crazyer though.

    • So, Abby, would you have us believe that 5400 years ago a being which came from nowhere created the universe out of nothing, made people out of dust, was dissatisfied with the female for claiming equality with the male, evicted the female and made another from the male’s rib so she’d be subservient, etc.? Where’s the logic in that?
      Asking for a friend.

  13. Do it bro, become an archaeologist, or an archaeopalentologist, or whatever! I let someone talk me out it many years ago, to my great regret now…. but the bug never got out of my system. Good luck to you.

  14. Dinosaurs were here when humankind were around…
    Wasn’t until the 1940s that we started naming them Dinosaurs….
    The old scholars once called them Dragons…
    And archeologists have proof that they were here in later times…
    They never died millions of years ago, They were hunted to extinction…
    You gotta put the pieces together…
    Explain all the kingdoms in brittania and in china with Dragon symbols?

  15. Reading people’s arguments is very interesting considering the fact i’m 13 and just reading this because it’s what i want to do with my life.

    • Learning about dinosaurs and fossils is wonderful however shouldn’t you be on the cheerleading squad or a soccer team instead of just reading peoples comments/back-and-forth ranting about may or may not be in this case truest of facts about this incredible rate absolutely beautiful specimen..

    • You go, Blaze! This is a fascinating field of study and I wish I had pursued it when I had the chance. I enjoy articles like this and you, at the young age of 13 and having an interest in it is wonderful. I advocate for the PhD as well. It’ll open many more doors for you. NO, you should not have be going to games, and being a cheerleader if that is not on your list of enjoyable activities. You be you. Hugs.

    • Ignore any negative or sarcastic comments. The adults are usually more childish then any child! You follow your dreams and you will go to work daily doing something you love. You can accomplish anything you put your heart and hard work into. Good luck to you, I hope to read some of your fascinating and educational articles in the future.

    • haha I love this comment. its like in the sea of random and ignorant arguments, theres just someone who is just enjoying the Dinosaur.. you are what we need more in life. lmaoo

  16. Evolution is real. This is millions of years old. Your religious beliefs don’t change science as much as many seem to wish it would. This is an amazing find or a well preserved nodosaur.

  17. Everybody here is basically telling the thought process they have been taught their whole life!! While I personally believe in adaptation of species and evolution of all life. Let those who believe in other realms of consciousness, BELIEVE!! It hurts no one!!!!!!

    • Actually, it does hurt progress and and the further development of science because they will in turn teach many others in the next generation about their incorrect ideologies and then the cycle continues. It just mankind from moving forward.

  18. You only have to google “scientific theory’s proven wrong” and you get an almost endless supply of so called “theory’s” That fooled so called experts. In some cases these “theory’s” where believed to be “fact” for decades.

    • Come back and comment after you learn proper English. I suggest starting with the difference between plurals and possessives. After that, you can work on the “Scientific Method”. Then, maybe, you might have a base to actually discuss issues of science with other adults.

    • A scientific theory isn’t a fact. Thats why its a theory. That’s just the best explanation at the time, as why it has happened. When our knowledge changes, so does the theory.

      • All facts are rooted in scientific theory. Mundane facts, such as the fact that shoes that lace up have to be laced, aren’t bothered with, but significant facts, such as the fact that the moon orbits the Earth are scientific theories. It’s called a fact because the evidence supporting the theory is extensive, and it’s withstood countless tests.

      • Um, theory in this case is not like, “Ah, Watson, I have a theory”. It means that it has been vetted, and best explains the situation with the facts at hand.

    • Theories. The word theory’s means that it belongs to the theory. The word theories means more than one theory. How can we trust you to know what you’re talking about if you can’t even be bothered to educate yourself on the language you speak.

  19. The trouble with bible nuts and anti-evolutinists is that their tiny little minds are made up and it is almost impossible to shake a closely-held belief, no matter how much logic and evidence you bring to the argument.

    • Is your mind made up? Would any argument change your mind?

      When scientist Mary Schweitzer was trying to persuade a fellow researcher that she had found soft tissue in dinosaur fossils, something that should be impossible if the fossils were indeed as old as scientists believe them to be, he stated that what she was proposing was impossible, that she could not possibly have found what she claimed to have found. She asked him what sort of evidence it would take to change his mind. He replied that no evidence would be sufficient to change his mind.

      Some evolutionists also lack the ability to reconsider their views, “no matter how much logic and evidence you bring to the argument.” Could you be one of those?

      • Cute story bro.
        “One thing that does bother me, though, is that young earth creationists take my research and use it for their own message, and I think they are misleading people about it. Pastors and evangelists, who are in a position of leadership, are doubly responsible for checking facts and getting things right, but they have misquoted me and misrepresented the data. They’re looking at this research in terms of a false dichotomy [science versus faith] and that doesn’t do anybody any favours.” Mary Higby Schweitzer

    • ya sound so silly. the trouble with u is u think u know somethng lol! and ya don’t know anymore or can prove anymore than I could

  20. Not a theory, but a fact: Examination of the larynx of several species indicate that dinosaurs found in the Alberta area were capable of making unique sounds. Purportedly, they could often heard to make noises approximating the utterance “eh”.

    • The unfalsified theory is the highest form of proof there is in science. Nothing is ever elevated to the lofty status of truth bc science always has to remain open to the possibility that new data will be uncovered which will better explain whatever it is we are explaining or defining. This is why whether it’s gravity or germs or evolution (things we all know exist) we still use the word theory. This doesnt mean it’s mean theoretical. The word theory has two nearly contradictory meanings, one is a speculative idea or thought and the other is the unfalsified scientific theory,, which, as I said, is the highest form of proof there is in the scientific method.

      • A “best ” explanation is still a theory. Unless you have valid, repeatable proof, it remains theory. No theory is more valid than another, because neither has been proven. The age of the earth will never be proven, and thus remains a theory. Unfalsified, so not intentionally false, but not fact either, so just an unverified theory. Nice try, still just an unproven idea.

  21. I guess science and geology do not matter to you as in a 110 million years the earth and its waters have shifted dramatically. Or do you believe the earth is only 5000 yrs. old?

      • Hi Forrest,
        Gaps in the fossil record are NOT a problem for the theory of evolution. De Beer put that to rest in 1930 with his work on evolutionary developmental biology.
        Evolution most definitely IS true – its being referred to as a theory does not mean it is a guess or a hypothesis. You may recall that it is a ‘Theory of Gravity” too.

      • Someone here needs to understand what a THEORY is.

        It is NOT a hypothesis. It is a scientific understanding of reality that has a preponderance of evidence behind it.

        Please learn what words mean and how to use them.

        • This is the best argument so far because semantics and close-minded belief is the source of all conflict on this merry-go-round.

      • Respectfully, evolution is referred to as a Theory in the scientific sense. Gravity is also referred to as a theory. Both have thus far stood up to all possible scrutiny but science, being open to new data and being based on modifying its principles to fit new data, unlike dogma or religion, uses the word “theory” rather than “law” or “fact,” when in fact the amount of evidence to support it is insurmountably huge and has even been observed in real time. There is no problem with the gaps in the fossil record except the inability of small minds to comprehend the vast breadth of time and to be astonished at how FEW “humongous” gaps remain in that fossil record, and how many of those gaps have been filled.

        • I’m not intending to argue anything just came to say that gravity is a law. The theory of relativity that explains how gravity works is a theory but gravity itself is a law. When something can be directly observed and repeated with the same results and equations can be written to predict these observations a they are considered laws. Theories are just the best explanation for a set of observations/facts.

      • For something to be considered a theory in it means it has to have near irrefutable proof and facts backing it up. A theory in scientific terms doesn’t just mean a hunch, it means something is basically proven to be true.

        • Just saying nothing in saving is ever proven. “Proof” in science is a myth. There may be evidence that supports a theory but there is no proof and it is not proven. In fact the greatest contributors to science have been people that have questioned the narrative and have shown theories to be wrong (geocentric in particular). Does not mean evidence can not be compelling but it is technically not proof.

      • Im tired of having to say this so look it up if you dont believe me. But theories in science arent guesses. Theyre the best explanation we have for things we observe. You are understandably conflating theory and hypothesis because outside of science we use them interchangeably

      • This is a misunderstanding of what a scientific theory is. Theory in everyday conversation means it’s not necessarily fact, but in scientific terms, a theory is something proven far beyond reasonable doubt and is as close to fact as science can get.

        • Why does this always happen , its would be nice if more people debated rather then argued ..:( all this ability to connect with one another across vast distances and so much of that luxory wasted ..

          I just think this is pretty cool 🙂

        • Religion isn’t even a theory. It’s a belief. A shared group belief, but just a belief. No proof given, none available; they explain that by saying you have to “have faith.”

      • Define what a scientific theory is, then tell me what is more important, a scientific law or a scientific theory. Because I’m betting my next paycheck you get the very basic fundamental definition wrong.

      • Absolutely nothing from is factual. Cults are not in the business of providing scientific facts, especially if those facts contradict their teachings. They make up their own “facts”.

      • You sir, do not understand the difference between a scientific theory and the colloquial use of the term. A scientific theory is not just a guess. Gravity is a theory. I don’t see you jumping off high cliffs to test it out

    • Laugh at how it’s awesome they found this so well preserved? Yeah it is awesome. Or do you believe the earth isn’t millions of years old?

  22. Same old nonsense from the bronze-age, fundamentalist, Abrahamic, claptrap purveyors of the Judaeo-Christian, Moslem belief systems I see!

  23. Evolution is a THEORY, not a fact! Darwin denounced it before he died. Scientists can’t because it would cost millions to change all the highway signs, museum signs, text books, etc. All because of their ‘mistakes’. That is a LOT of egg on your faces…

    • That’s actually a myth. Darwin’s children said he never reverted back to Christianity nor denounced evolution on his death bed.
      Enjoy your omelette.

    • Scientific theories are facts.

      Colloquial theory and scientific theory are two different things.

      If you don’t believe in evolution, you better stay away from modern medicine, as everything to do with biology hinges on the fact that evolution is true.

        • On the contrary, a theory holds up if it fails to be disproven. A theory has to hold up against attempts to falsify. Otherwise any theory that fits the data would be taken as fact.

          • Exactly, A Theory holds up. It still remains a Theory until repeatedly proven, then it becomes a fact. If it fails, its obviously disproven, and most times discarded until a few flat earthers pick it up again.

            • Minor correction, there.
              Theories don’t get promoted to Facts. Facts support Theories.

              And a Theory isn’t ‘repeatedly proven.’ It’s just not DISproven, which isn’t the same thing.

        • Holden, you are correct but it has to be proven many times simpletons will accept things like darwins theory of evolution which in no way shape, or form has been proven even one time yet they swallow that camel as if it is fact which shows how easily lead the “scientific” community is lead down rediculous paths of false education hence the reason so many of our medicals communities are so far lost to such nonsense and we get no REAL treatments that will fight real disease…
          the only REAL PROVEN SCIENCE we have on this earth is the science of numbers…that is irrefutable…

      • There are facts that support theories, and when a theory is 100% proven is no longer a theory but a fact, so a theory is not itself a fact.
        Christianity have ZERO facts.

        • Evolution is a fantasy religion not based on real science!
          It is easily proved a lie by the known laws of nature that they even tell you in books on evution!
          It is a fact that according to science every major mutation in nature is sterile and cannot reproduce.
          So any evolution cannot happen if it cannot reproduce itself.
          Also according to the second law of thermodynamics, all nature goes from more complex to less complex state.
          So nature left to itself naturally evolves to a lower state not more highly evolved state.

          • Evolution happens in hours when bacteria becomes resistant to antibiotics . You should read more . Education is key to making knowledgeable statements. The Bible is not a factual book.

          • Reality check: If your interpretation of the 2nd law of thermodynamics were correct, then the growth of an individual multicellular organism, from a single cell to its adult form, would be impossible.

            But the 2nd law of thermodynamics says that *a closed system* tends to move towards disorder. A “closed system” is one that doesn’t have an external source of energy.

            The Earth has an external source of energy: The Sun. Plants use that energy to grow. Other animals feed on those plants, gaining their energy. And other animals feed on those animals. Etc. There is no contradiction of the 2nd law of thermodynamics here.

            Oh, and biology doesn’t say that “every major mutation in nature is sterile”, nor does evolution require “major mutations” to happen all at once.

          • You state that every major mutation is sterile, but evolution does not occur via major mutation. Minor changes result in evolutionary advancement.

          • If evolution is a fantasy, why did Jesus who originated in the middle east, a land of swarthy people with brown and black hair, morph into a tall slim white man with a light brown, almost blond hair? He now seems to have blue eyes in some of his pictures, now is that a fact of evolution or a religious ego fantasy?

        • Actually a theory is always a theory – a theory explains the facts and is based on the body of facts it explains – a theory is never itself a fact. The theory, not the fact, is the most important aspect of science. Without theories there are just an amorphous body of facts, and the application of science would be impossible.

    • A scientific theory is an explanation of an aspect of the natural world that can be repeatedly tested and verified in accordance with the scientific method, using accepted protocols of observation, measurement, and evaluation of results.

      Other scientific theories include the theory of gravity, plate tectonic theory, and the theory of relativity (which includes the math that makes GPS satellites work).

    • Wow, you have to pretend to know nothing about biology to believe that. Bacteria and viruses are definitive proof the evolution is a fact. Darwin never retracted his theories, that’s BS made up by Christian anti science warriors. Apparently with enough $$$ and tv exposure, you can convince non critical thinkers of anything.

    • 1. Obviously a troll. Is this y’all’s first time on the Internet?

      2. Who would try and troll an article about dinosaurs? Well, successfully troll. Think I answered my own question.

    • I’m also a Christian and feel inclined to point out that gravity is also a scientific theory, so …. It’s important to note that “science” never lands on absolute truth. I personally don’t have a stance on evolution. I also would appreciate it if scientists didn’t try to “prove” religion false, it’s not really their realm of expertise, and much of what theology purports as true is not even subject to scientific method. Here’s a great speech about why it’s really quite foolish to try and prove religion wrong as a scientist:

    • Baloney! Imagine loading that on Noah’s ark? Boy, it takes a special kind of twerp to believe that bronze-age, Abrahamic, fundamentalist, Judaeo-Christian, Moslem claptrap.

    • I tend to believe that species slowly evolved to their environment over millions of years than a 3 day dead man magically rose from the dead. Egg…

    • Ah, so “proud to be Christian” is an apostate cultist. Mainstream Christians accept evolution – we are not ignorant, medieval-minded dolts.

    • It’s astounding that people are still walking around with 12th century worldviews in this 21st century. It’s a wonder that such people can manage to survive from day to day.

    • You misunderstand scientific terminology.

      “In general, a scientific law is the description of an observed phenomenon. It doesn’t explain why the phenomenon exists or what causes it. The explanation of a phenomenon is called a scientific theory. It is a misconception that theories turn into laws with enough research.”

      A fact is simply an observation (ie “the ball is red”) a law is an application of mathematical understanding to predict or calculate the results of a certain condition “if I turn off the lights, I will not be able to see the ball” a theory is a universally accepted explanation for a law or fact “the ball appears red because the cones in our eyes detect the red light waves reflected off the ball from the light”

    • Exactly, THEORY per
      a coherent group of propositions formulated to explain a group of facts or phenomena in the natural world and repeatedly confirmed through experiment or observation:
      the scientific theory of evolution.”

      But why are we still explaining this, the trolls must know this, they just don’t believe in facts, knowledge, reason, logic… Just troll beliefs

    • Your statement is laughable. There is plenty of proof and theory regarding evolution. It’s religion that has no proof, just belief.

  24. I find it doubtful DNA could be extracted to make a clone as all organic matter has been replaced by stone. Perhaps petrified would be a more accurate word than mummified. You could no more make a clone of this creature than you could clone a tree from petrified wood. But I do share the excitement of the idea of a living breathing dinosaur!

  25. Nodosaur was found at Suncor mine at Fort Mcmurray Alberta.It was in good condition because it somehow washed out a river to the Pacific ocean settling on the ocean floor to be covered with sediment. Their words not mine. It was found far inland but was in the ocean??? No do saur

    • Yes, there are definitely no large rivers that lead to the Pacific Ocean. Certainly not the Yangtze, the Mekong, the Yellow…

    • well…its 100,000,000 years old. The continents we know were just separating from the supercontinent Pangea. As the tektonic plates shift they also warp and ripple. Parts of the ocean floor rise up to become land and parts of land sink and become ocean. At one point, the majority of Canada was at the bottom of the ocean.

    • Not the Pacific Ocean. The Great Western Inland Sea. Alberta didn’t look like it does today when dinosaurs roamed the earth.

  26. If? Or? You call this proof? It’s a fantasy story you made up in your head.
    Leave paleontology to the professionals and keep your fiction to yourself.

  27. It’s a good made up replica. I think all dinosaurs that have been found are just made up so the museums & the archeologists can get their name famous & keep getting funding for their “jobs”.

  28. Oh, wonderful. You grab an exception and make it the norm. What about all the other millions of dinosaur specimens that are just fossilized bones? What about all those animals and plants found in certain strata and not others? What about extinction or new species? Even if evolution were somehow wrong, extinction and speciation, natural selection would continue to be FACT. Creationism and the deluge that somehow is included in the mix is mythology.

  29. It weighed 3000 pounds, it would have sank to depths too deep and too cold to be eaten. That’s how things get fossilized. Take a science course or two. Lay off the Bible just a bit. There are other books out there. Newer and better ones even. Obsessivly re-reading the same book over and over and over is a bit insane.

  30. That’s the stupidest thing I’ve seen all day. Maybe all week, which is a lot with those anti-vaxxers and corona conspiracy theories popping up.

    • There have been human remains left in a similar state. The bog bodies. These were people that were killed and their bodies disposed of in bogs. Several were found in Denmark. Lack of oxygen in the bogs preserved them. The oldest is about 10,000 years old.

    • The Bible, and Revelations specifically speak about some problems that John and the congregations he corresponded with had with the Romans and other peoples in the Roman Empire about 1950 years ago. The language is so cryptic or so general so as to mean literally anything and nothing. A flu epidemic is hardly the apocalypse. Try 1939. It wasn’t the apocalypse either. When will you give up?

    • Exactly what I say. Sounds like it was quickly covered and mummified, like the fountains of the deep erupted and it got covered quickly and preserved.

        • sometimes it hurts peoples brains to think that anything other than humans ruled this earth at some point in time, so they just refuse to belive it… these people are called “closed-minded” . being close minded is a very bad trait. if it werent for the “open minded” people like einstein and galileo we would still be in the prehistoric period like this lady. SMH think outside the box for once in your life and then you might be able to understand that the earth has been here for billions and billions of years and there were many different civilizations that ran this earth besides humans!

          • So then, if you also believe that mans influence on the earth is heating it up enough to cause global warming, it would stand to reason that if we stayed “closed minded” there would not be enough of us today to cause it. So closed minded is good?

      • If that had happened it would not be intact to study. Quick, violent events like that don’t mummify things, they destroy them. Thousands of years ago would be close enough that we would also have actual evidence of the event for it to do that, too, and we don’t.

        • The mummies at Pompeii — who died in a sudden, violent volcanic eruption– would disagree with the idea that things can’t be preserved like that.

          • The ‘bodies’ at Pompeii aren’t mummies. The dead bodies decomposed and created cavities in the volcanic pumice and ash, which people poured plaster in to create the ‘bodies’ we can now see.

    • It’s fossilized entirely or to a degree. If it weren’t millions of years old, it would be an organic mummy like the ones we have from mummified humans, or Megatherium, or Mammoths.

    • Lorenzo Luis Albano you are correct although you couldn’t convince those who think they already know everything.There is so much information in the world that is being hidden and kept secret from the public like real dinosaurs aren’t all as old as the so called experts would have you believe.Man has lived with and beside the dinosaurs but they don’t want you knowing that.There are cave paintings and carvings with man standing with the dinosaurs and just how do you think that’s possible if they dies out millions of years ago.And how could man paint or carve something like that if he has never seen such creatures.It’s not like they just dreamed of them one day and decided to paint or care something they dreamed of.They did it simply because they lived side by side.They call this forbidden knowledge just like the giants that once walked the earth along side of man.One can only wonder why they think it’s so important to keep this knowledge so secret.But like the ole saying goes he who controls the knowledge controls the world.

      • Or… since there is no reason to hide the knowledge, maybe it is just simply as true to the point that science can currently estimate.

        Anytime I hear “they” are hiding the truth from you I have to roll my eyes. There need not be a giant conspiracy for everything.

      • …and for what reason is there to hide the knowledge? There’s no conspiracy – the universe is just a lot more complicated than your mommy and daddy led you to believe.

      • Often enough these “dinosaur cave paintings” are just existing ones with additions made to them in chalk, or purposefully misread paintings of creatures that actually existed at the time. Also, though this less the reason why you are wrong in general and more just another thing you are wrong about, humans most certainly could have painted and carved depictions of creatures that they had never seen. It’s called imagination. People do it now, people did it thousands of years ago when they portrayed mythological creatures, and I doubt the ones that made the cave paintings were incapable of it.

  31. Good grief! This dinosaur lived 110 million years ago! That’s approximately 109,997,000 before Jesus walked the Earth, and 100,000,000 years before the earliest humans! Creationism is made up.

    • I’m sorry you don’t understand Heavenly Father’s time. Just because lots of people believe that a day is 24 hours doesn’t mean that is reality for all. It is simply the revolution of time scientists have given. Heavenly Father’s day could be equivalent to 100,000,000,000 of our days. Evolution is real but so is Creationism. I don’t understand how some people can’t wrap their over educated brain around it. Why do you see it as either one or the other? Some things/creatures evolved after being created. And some things/creatures were CREATED. I personally believe some people just need to argue about something/anything to feel alive or be fulfilled/validated.

  32. This is absolutely amazing, me being the dinosaur nerd that I am this totally peaked my interest and brightened my day

    • Kimberly, you can believe anything you want. That is why I live in this country. Sorry to say that the “Great Flood” did not occur at the correct time frame. but nice to keep the dream alive. As for being covered by sediment, well, I could give you a dozen ways for that to happen. Let’s just agree to disagree. Smile.

    • Funny how those without a REAL response always resort to laughter or belittling. Thanks for staying true to your kind!

    • They’ve confirmed that it’s pretty much impossible. It’s in the best condition that we’ve found, but even that isn’t good enough to allow us to get DNA.

    • A perfectly preserved DNA sample could theoretically last about 6.8 million years, by the most recent studies available. This is sadly much too recent for dinosaurs, but might allow cloning some extinct prehistoric species like saber-tooth tigers if a perfect sample is ever found.

      • Hey Bob, that 7M years is if it’s frozen at 28 degrees F. At the temperature of Montana strata that brings DNA survival down to just thousands of years before it should decay to single nucleotides.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here