Comparing the Effect of Light Pollution Before & After Dunedin, New Zealand, Changed to LED Lighting

There’s a five-year difference between the left side and right side of the picture. That’s the period when the city if Dunedin in New Zealand changed its sodium lights to shielded LED lighting.

dunedin led lights comparison sodium lights fb

The effect: less light pollution for animals, a more visible nightsky for people to admire. The two photos below were taken by amateur astrophotographer Brad Phipps five years apart, with the same camera (Sony a7S Mk1), the same lens (Sony 16-35mm), the same camera settings (16mm, ISO 2000, 8″ exposure, F4) and at the same location.

Clearly a win-win sitation…except for astronomers. While telescope sodium filters are designed to block out the sodium yellow, and allow the starlight through, the new lamps produce light including the same wavelengths as starlight. This could make astronomers’ work somewhat more difficult.

But hey, aren’t a few thousand people being able to see the stars at night more important than maybe a couple of astronomers who are active in the area? Also, the new lights are shielded, which means the light doesn’t go up, as in the case of the old sodium ones. So after all, the change might not affect even astronomers that badly.

Just look at the difference.

    Stay part of the Mission! Get our latest articles to your inbox!

    dunedin led lights comparison sodium lights
    Photo: Brad Phipps/Source

    Earthly Mission is done by two guys driven by the love for what we are doing. Please kindly consider keeping us going – every bit helps!

    DonateDonate
    Written by Tamás Varga
    Photo of author
    A sociologist and English major by degree, I've worked in the area of civil society & human rights and have been blogging in the fields of travel, nature & science for over 20 years.

    Check out my other project (especially if you're planning to visit Budapest soon) 👇

    Day Trips from Budapest
    Earthly Mission
    error: